Lithonia Lighting's parent company, Acuity Brands (NYSE: AYI), demonstrates strong in-store performance with market-leading positioning as the largest lighting manufacturer in North America. According to Grips Intelligence data from January-June 2026, the brand's offline channel strategy is heavily concentrated at Lowe's, which serves as the dominant distribution partner with 54.7% revenue share, followed by Menards.com at 19.7% and Home Depot at 16.0%. The product portfolio shows strong average pricing at $55.30, with premium LED panel and strip light fixtures commanding prices up to $93.93 across major home improvement retailers. However, the period saw headwinds with overall revenue declining 5.5% since the start of the data collection, signaling a challenging market environment for the brand during the first half of 2026.
OVER TIME
Over the last three months, revenue on tracked channels has declined by 5% from Apr to Jun.
OVER TIME
Over the last three months, average selling price on tracked channels has increased by 1% from Apr to Jun.
REVENUE SHARE
Revenue distribution across product categories for Lithonia Lighting on Amazon.
REVENUE SHARE
Revenue distribution across tracked channels for Lithonia Lighting.
BY REVENUE
Lithonia Lighting sells 26% online and 74% offline. Online runs through 2 channels; offline through 2. Online share has moved from 12% in Feb to 11% in Jun.
Online
26%
74%
Offline
Online channels
26%
Offline channels
74%
BY REVIEW COUNT
Across 377K ratings on 4 channels, Lithonia Lighting averages 4.5★. Most reviews for the products are in the 4.6–4.8 range.
BRAND AVERAGE
4.5
/ 5
From 377K ratings
Products are bracketed by their average rating, so all of an individual product's reviews fall into one bracket. This isn't a per-star breakdown of individual reviews.
BY REVENUE
$93.93
Price
$364K
Revenue
$71.80
Price
$272K
Revenue
$52.98
Price
$207K
Revenue
$25.09
Price
$198K
Revenue
$39.98
Price
$104K
Revenue
$149.99
Price
Revenue
$329.99
Price
Revenue
$89.99
Price
Revenue
Get access to full product performance analysis